Create an Account
Already have a user account?

Supreme Court sets aside RBI ban on cryptocurrency transactions

Healthy Grocery Girl Healthy Grocery Girl Forums Introduce Yourself Supreme Court sets aside RBI ban on cryptocurrency transactions

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Author
    • #73131

      Top court finds prohibitive circular too disproportionate
      The Supreme Court on March 4 set aside an April 6, 2018, circular of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) prohibiting banks and entities regulated by it from providing services in relation to virtual currencies (VCs).

      “Till date, RBI has not come out with a stand that any of the entities regulated by it namely, nationalised banks/scheduled commercial banks/cooperative banks/NBFCs, have suffered any loss or adverse effect directly or indirectly, on account of VC exchanges,” a Bench comprising Justices Rohinton Nariman, Aniruddha Bose and V. Ramasubramanian observed in a 180-page judgment.

      Representational image. File
      SC order on cryptocurrency will offer only temporary relief

      Justice Ramasubramanian, who authored the ruling, found the RBI circular “disproportionate” with an otherwise consistent stand taken by the central bank that VCs were not prohibited in the country. Besides, the court found that the RBI did not consider the availability of alternatives before issuing the circular.

      Again, the April circular was issued despite the fact that the central bank could not quote a single instance when VC exchanges “actually impacted entities regulated by RBI”. VCs are digital currencies in which encryption techniques are used to regulate the generation of the currency units and verify the transfer of funds, operating independently of a central bank.

      Besides, the apex court referred to the Centre’s failure to introduce an official digital Rupee despite two draft bills and several committees. “When the Government of India is unable to take a call despite several committees coming up with several proposals including two draft Bills, both of which advocated exactly opposite positions, it is not possible for us to hold that the impugned measure (April 6, 2018 circular) is proportionate,” Justice Ramasubramanian wrote.

      The court expanded on how the Centre had been toying with plans for an official digital currency.

      On November 2, 2017, the Centre constituted an Inter-Ministerial Committee, which initially recommended the ‘Crypto-token Regulation Bill of 2018’. This Bill found a complete ban on VCs an “extreme tool” and suggested regulatory measures. At that point, the committee was even fine with the idea of allowing the sale and purchase of digital crypto assets at recognised exchanges.

    • #73335

      Have you ever thought why some governments are so negative to legalize cryptocurrency? We all know that blockchain technology is very transparent. But we cannot say the same about the banking system. So crypto gives more freedom to people as authorities will have less control. But nobody will be able to stop crypto development. Read the Cryptocurrency Blog at Blog.Switchere to learn more.

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.